Written by A shareholder activist is a person who makes an effort to utilize their rights as a publicly traded company’s shareholder to influence the company or its policies. By using their rights as co-owners, shareholders can exert influence over a company’s actions through shareholder activism. Different classes of shares provide different dividend entitlements as well as different voting rights. Even if they don’t oversee daily operations, minority shareholders have several ways to affect the decisions made by the board of directors and top management of a corporation. These techniques can include having discussions with managers or submitting formal motions that are put to a vote at an annual meeting of shareholders. They could strategically use media outlets to spread the word about their demands and increase pressure from other shareholders. If they are not given a voice, they can potentially threaten to sue businesses. Shareholder activists address a variety of concerns, such as social change, which calls for divesting from politically sensitive regions of the world, more support for workers’ rights (sweatshops), and/or increased accountability for environmental degradation. However, investors who think that a company’s management is doing poorly might also be referred to by this word. This group of activist investors frequently tries to take over the business, fire the management, or impose significant internal changes. The amount of money invested in shareholder activism has grown over time, as has the number of initiatives that have been launched. As per the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, shareholder activists had an unprecedented year in 2018. Throughout the year, about $65 billion in cash was deployed; 250 campaigns were started, and there were 130 investors in 2018, up from 110 in 2017.
In addition to his activities as a businessman, traditional investor, and philanthropist, Carl Icahn is one of the most well-known activist shareholders in the financial sector. Mr. Icahn gained a solid reputation as a “corporate raider” during the 1980s. This resulted, among other things, from his hostile 1985 takeover of TWA Airlines. TWA was one of the biggest airlines in the country at the time, along with American Airlines and Texaco. Over several years, Mr. Icahn skillfully assumed control of the business and guided it away from the verge of bankruptcy. The EMA is a weighted moving average that prioritizes recent price data over historical data. As a result, EMA responds to price fluctuations more quickly than a simple moving average (SMA). A portion of these funds are being promoted by investors who aim to acquire companies that exhibit a strong dedication to corporate social responsibility. This obligation might manifest itself in governance issues like diversity in the boardroom or environmental issues like climate change. As an illustration, the NYC Pension Fund started the Boardroom Accountability Project, which mandates that businesses reveal the racial, gender, and skill backgrounds of their directors. A few hundred or even a few thousand shares does not provide an investor with much clout with management. A sizable portion of a company’s shares are bought (or shorted) by activist investors to draw attention to themselves. They utilize the considerable exposure they receive from the media to voice their complaints. An activist cannot be disregarded by the board or management of the corporation. A specialized hedge fund, acting as an activist investor, purchases a sizeable minority position in a publicly traded firm to alter its operations. The objectives of an activist investor might range from something as simple as offering management advice to something as complex as pressuring the company to sell, restructure, force divestitures, or even replace the board of directors. Activist investors rarely purchase complete or majority holdings in corporations, in contrast to private equity firms that buy and reorganize businesses to profit when they are resold. Rather, they court other stockholders and corporate insiders through both open and closed channels of contact. If these initiatives fall short, an activist investor may try to compel the firm to comply with their demands by running a proxy contest to choose new directors. Activists possess the ability to force management to answer for their actions and demand outcomes. They’ll put in a lot of effort to increase stakeholder value. A lot of people believe that activists are more intelligent than typical investors. They have access to credible information, a wealth of industry contacts, and a great deal of experience. But activists aren’t always in the right. They occasionally lose money, and their timing can be incorrect. Other times, their brilliant ideas might not work out for an unusually extended period. They have the means to endure it. When an investor feels inclined to mimic an activist’s buying or selling behavior, they should remember this. An indecisive group, activists can be. They might take a stand and stick with it for a long time. They might leave at any time if they are unable to secure a position on the board or convince the business to support their goals. To put it briefly, it is crucial to remember that activists could have a somewhat different investing horizon than the typical investor. Furthermore, they can be far better equipped and willing to accept a loss on their wagers.
Written by 
Written by